Law Offices of Connie Yi, PC - estate planning
Tell Us About Your Case

For the safety of our community, clients and staff, we have suspended all in-person meeting effective March 17, 2020. All consultation meetings will be via Phone or Zoom Video Conferencing. Please contact us at 925-484-0888 or email us directly at [email protected] to schedule the consultation.

Bay Area Estate And Tax Planning Law Firm
Estate Planning
Trust Administration and probate

Is the IRS bluffing about gambling tax threshold change?

| Jul 13, 2015 | Uncategorized |

A rule change proposed by the IRS could make a weekend in Las Vegas a little less attractive for Bay Area gamblers. The IRS would like to lower a reporting threshold for certain winnings, and casino owners say it would take a large bite out of their bottom lines.

Right now, anyone who wins $1,200 or more playing a slot machine receives a form W-2G from the casino. The casino pays whatever is left after both federal and state income taxes are deducted. The winner must file the form with his regular annual return; the IRS or the state (or both) will match the casino’s information with the winner’s. Needless to say, if they don’t match, there could be a problem.

The IRS would like to lower that $1,200 to $600. It seems the odds are much better that a slot player will hit the lower jackpot. Casinos will be handing out as many as eight to 12 times the number of W-2Gs if the rule change goes through.

Casino owners have a couple of complaints. They contest that gamblers will stop gambling after they hit the $600 mark. They’ll have to get up, find an attendant and take care of the paperwork — they’re likely to find something else to do after that. Breaking a player’s momentum, casinos believe, could cost them dearly — a 3 percent to 5 percent loss, according to one financial analyst. There is also a certain amount of inconvenience for casinos.

The lower amount also smacks of micro-management from the IRS. That same analyst suggests that the government is telling gamblers that $600 is quite enough money and it’s time to walk away.

The rule is only proposed at this point. Its adoption is not, by any means, a sure thing.

Source: CNBC, “An obscure IRS shift could be bad news for Las Vegas,” Alex Rosenberg, July 4, 2015


FindLaw Network

Recent Blog Post

Is estate planning necessary for young people?

Misconceptions exist about the relationship between age and estate planning. Yes, older people may prioritize estate planning for reasons related to advancing age and health concerns. That does not mean only older California residents benefit from the process. Young...

What are the responsibilities of a fiduciary?

Residents of California may want to learn more about the role of the fiduciary and their responsibilities. Because fiduciary duty may be a requirement among certain professions, clients and professionals should know more about what this is. The meaning of fiduciary...

5 factors to consider when choosing a guardian

For parents, one of the biggest reasons they decide to create an estate plan is to ensure their child will be cared for no matter what. It isn’t easy to think about a tragedy where a child may lose both their parents before they turn 18, but parents have to plan for...

View More Blog Posts