Law Offices Of Connie Yi, PC
Tell Us About Your Case

For the safety of our community, clients and staff, we have suspended all in-person meeting effective March 17, 2020. All consultation meetings will be via Phone or Zoom Video Conferencing. Please contact us at 925-484-0888 or email us directly at [email protected] to schedule the consultation.

Bay Area Estate And Tax Planning Law Firm
Estate Planning
Trust Administration and probate

Get
Started

Thicke estate litigation update: things seem less than clear

| Jul 17, 2017 | Uncategorized |

The California judge slated to rule this upcoming September on a dismissal motion filed last week by Tanya Thicke might have things clearly in mind and fully pieced together by then, being capable of weighing in definitively and with full confidence on the matter.

On the other hand …

Frankly, Thicke’s petition seems to muddy judicial waters more than it calms them, given that, at the same time she is vowing not to question or file legal proceedings regarding an ongoing and bitter estate battle, she is also manifestly criticizing an extant document that sets forth and limits her property claims.

We first visited the estate imbroglio that quickly emerged in the wake of entertainer Alan Thicke’s death this past spring in a May 24 blog entry, noting therein the clear rancor existing between Tanya Thicke — Alan Thicke’s wife upon his death — and Thicke’s children.

Two of Thicke’s sons are co-trustees of a trust established by their father prior to his death. They filed a petition in May alleging that Tanya Thicke was threatening to turn the estate matter into a tabloid spectacle and trying to increase her estate take by breaking a prenuptial agreement she and Thicke executed prior to their marriage.

Her legal response last week accused the brothers of trying to smear her and sully her reputation. Her attorney says she has no intention of doing anything other than fully honoring the marital contract she signed.

Notably, though, and notwithstanding that assertion, Tanya Thicke’s legal counsel lambasts the agreement she says she will not challenge, stating that its validity is questionable because she was forced to sign it within a limited time and absent legal representation. Tanya Thicke’s dismissal petition goes on to call the prenuptial agreement “unfair and even “ridiculous” for myriad problems it allegedly contains.

The court is scheduled to rule on the petition September 14.

 

Categories

Archives

FindLaw Network

Recent Blog Post

What are reasonable fees to charge as a trustee in California?

When implementing an estate plan in California, it is essential to ensure that you receive the proper compensation for the amount of time and work you are putting in. The probate court will look through the amount you charge to see if it is reasonable, especially if...

What to know about life insurance trusts

California families have an exemption for their estate that keeps it from being subject to income taxes. However, above that $11.7 million, the estate tax bill could get large. This is why they need to take measures to reduce the size of their taxable estate. Life...

Are estate taxes headed for changes?

Not every inheritance involves paying estate taxes, but some estates rise above the federal exclusion amount. California residents that feel familiar with state and federal tax rules might not realize changes could happen. Namely, proposals intended to raise tax...

View More Blog Posts