Law Offices of Connie Yi, PC - estate planning
Tell Us About Your Case

For the safety of our community, clients and staff, we have suspended all in-person meeting effective March 17, 2020. All consultation meetings will be via Phone or Zoom Video Conferencing. Please contact us at 925-484-0888 or email us directly at [email protected] to schedule the consultation.

Bay Area Estate And Tax Planning Law Firm
Estate Planning
Trust Administration and probate

What would Jimi Hendrix have thought of this estate battle?

| Mar 28, 2017 | Uncategorized |

With the 50th anniversary of famed rock guitarist Jimi Hendrix’s death fast approaching, it would seem reasonable to assume that any legal uncertainty and attendant acrimony involving his estate would be eclipsed and fading fast in the rear-view mirror of time.

Not even close.

Hendrix died in 1970. Now, decades later, two opposing sides staking a claim to the enduring residuals associated with his estate (more on that below) are battling furiously in court.

One side — which alleges that it is Hendrix’s sole lawful estate and has exclusive ownership and control over trademarks relevant to a dizzyingly broad catalogue of music and merchandize — contends that the other is infringing those rights and unlawfully profiting thereby. The estate brought a lawsuit earlier this month seeking to enforce its claims against Hendrix’s brother Leon and companies that one media report states sell “Hendrix-themed products.”

That argument, counters Leon, is entirely without merit, who formally responded to it by filing a counterclaim against the estate — principally, Hendrix’s stepsister Janie — alleging misrepresentation, tortious interference, defamation, trade libel and other wrongdoing. Leon says Janie has rights to only the deceased artist’s musical works and other limited properties and absolutely no entitlement to exclusively profit from Jimi Hendrix’s likeness or personality.

Our readers might surmise that things could have turned out differently in the wake of Hendrix’s passing, specifically as regards clarity in terms of what the famed performer would have wanted concerning his estate.

And they certainly could have — had the artist taken purposeful action to craft an estate plan.

Unfortunately, he did not. Hendrix never even got around to writing a will prior to his death.

And so his relatives continue to argue, nearly half a century following his passing.

There is unquestionably an instructive strain implicit in the complex narrative surrounding Hendrix’s ongoing estate battle.

And that is this: Making timely and well-considered planning decisions prior to death can eliminate lingering animosities and constant legal challenges years later.


FindLaw Network

Recent Blog Post

Is estate planning necessary for young people?

Misconceptions exist about the relationship between age and estate planning. Yes, older people may prioritize estate planning for reasons related to advancing age and health concerns. That does not mean only older California residents benefit from the process. Young...

What are the responsibilities of a fiduciary?

Residents of California may want to learn more about the role of the fiduciary and their responsibilities. Because fiduciary duty may be a requirement among certain professions, clients and professionals should know more about what this is. The meaning of fiduciary...

5 factors to consider when choosing a guardian

For parents, one of the biggest reasons they decide to create an estate plan is to ensure their child will be cared for no matter what. It isn’t easy to think about a tragedy where a child may lose both their parents before they turn 18, but parents have to plan for...

View More Blog Posts