Law Offices of Connie Yi, PC - estate planning
Tell Us About Your Case

For the safety of our community, clients and staff, we have suspended all in-person meeting effective March 17, 2020. All consultation meetings will be via Phone or Zoom Video Conferencing. Please contact us at 925-484-0888 or email us directly at [email protected] to schedule the consultation.

Bay Area Estate And Tax Planning Law Firm
Estate Planning
Trust Administration and probate

Update: new guidance issued for taxing virtual currency

| Mar 26, 2014 | Capital Gains Tax |

In our last post we discussed some different possibilities for how the Internal Revenue Service might tax the virtual currency known as bitcoin. The new type of currency has generated a lot of controversy and exists in a legal grey area because people are trading it for goods and services, holding it as an investment, and producing it as a business, but it is not recognized as a currency by any sovereign nation.

As we noted in our last post, this left bitcoin holders with a few choices on how to interpret their bitcoins for tax purposes, some with more convincing arguments than others. Now the bulk of the guesswork has been taken out of this process as the IRS has finally issued new guidance on how taxpayers should handle their bitcoins.

First and foremost bitcoins will be treated as property. This means that someone who holds bitcoins as an investment will pay capital gains tax, just as if they were holding other tangible assets. It also means that businesses that accept bitcoins in exchange for goods or services will have to declare the value of the bitcoins on the day of the transaction as a part of their gross income. For those who mine bitcoins

This guidance does not completely flush out all possible tax situations for people who use or invest in bitcoins, so it is important for people with specific questions about the best way to handle bitcoins to seek individualized advice from an experienced tax law professional.

Source: USA Today, “IRS: Bitcoin is not currency,” Donna Leinwand Leger, March 25, 2014.


FindLaw Network

Recent Blog Post

Is estate planning necessary for young people?

Misconceptions exist about the relationship between age and estate planning. Yes, older people may prioritize estate planning for reasons related to advancing age and health concerns. That does not mean only older California residents benefit from the process. Young...

What are the responsibilities of a fiduciary?

Residents of California may want to learn more about the role of the fiduciary and their responsibilities. Because fiduciary duty may be a requirement among certain professions, clients and professionals should know more about what this is. The meaning of fiduciary...

5 factors to consider when choosing a guardian

For parents, one of the biggest reasons they decide to create an estate plan is to ensure their child will be cared for no matter what. It isn’t easy to think about a tragedy where a child may lose both their parents before they turn 18, but parents have to plan for...

View More Blog Posts