Law Offices of Connie Yi, PC - estate planning
Tell Us About Your Case

For the safety of our community, clients and staff, we have suspended all in-person meeting effective March 17, 2020. All consultation meetings will be via Phone or Zoom Video Conferencing. Please contact us at 925-484-0888 or email us directly at [email protected] to schedule the consultation.

Bay Area Estate And Tax Planning Law Firm
Estate Planning
Trust Administration and probate

The federal income tax hits its 100 year anniversary

| Oct 3, 2013 | Uncategorized |

A lot of California readers probably don’t realize that there was a time in the United States when there was no federal income tax. The first instance of an income tax was during the Civil War when the government needed more revenue to continue fighting. That was a temporary tax that eventually expired, leaving the government to raise funds solely from tariffs from trade and excise taxes, as was the case before the war.

Interestingly enough, the tax debate in the 19th century was much the same as it is today, with advocates for the income tax arguing that use-based taxes (excise taxes) burdened the poor too heavily and that another source of revenue was needed to even the scales.

The first attempt at a non-temporary income tax was a flat tax at a rate of two percent, but that tax was eventually declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. 19 years later in 1913 the 16th Amendment was passed, making the federal income tax enshrined in the constitution itself.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was eventually established to help administer the income tax and make sure that everyone paid on time and in the correct amount. 

Then as now, almost as immediately as income tax laws were passed, so too were loopholes encoded into the law. And as is the case today, throughout history there have always been advocates seeing to abolish the federal income tax entirely. However, it is most likely that after 100 years of a pillar of our revenue system, the income tax is here to stay.

Source: New York Times, “Happy Centennial, Federal Income Tax,” Bruse Bartlett, Oct. 1, 2013. 


FindLaw Network

Recent Blog Post

Is estate planning necessary for young people?

Misconceptions exist about the relationship between age and estate planning. Yes, older people may prioritize estate planning for reasons related to advancing age and health concerns. That does not mean only older California residents benefit from the process. Young...

What are the responsibilities of a fiduciary?

Residents of California may want to learn more about the role of the fiduciary and their responsibilities. Because fiduciary duty may be a requirement among certain professions, clients and professionals should know more about what this is. The meaning of fiduciary...

5 factors to consider when choosing a guardian

For parents, one of the biggest reasons they decide to create an estate plan is to ensure their child will be cared for no matter what. It isn’t easy to think about a tragedy where a child may lose both their parents before they turn 18, but parents have to plan for...

View More Blog Posts