Law Offices of Connie Yi, PC
Tell Us About Your Case

For the safety of our community, clients and staff, we have suspended all in-person meeting effective March 17, 2020. All consultation meetings will be via Phone or Zoom Video Conferencing. Please contact us at (925) 484-0888 or email us directly at [email protected] to schedule the consultation.

View Our Practice Areas

Could expansive Tax Court ruling open up litigation flood gates?

Although a commentator in a recent media article on IRS whistleblowing calls a United States Tax Court ruling "good news," that sentiment is certainly not universally shared.

And it's especially not endorsed if you're an individual or business enterprise that suddenly becomes a named defendant in an agency whistleblowing case.

We provide immediately below a bit of material detail concerning a high-profile tax case decided earlier this month by the federal Tax Court.

Discussion commences with a spotlight being placed on the term "proceeds." In the context of IRS whistleblowing litigation, proceeds have customarily been construed by the agency in what the aforementioned article calls a "very narrow manner."

To wit: A whistleblower has long been eligible to join in the spoils in a whistleblower recovery only if taxes were collected from a defendant.

Given the court's recent ruling, though, more individuals might now be motivated to commence litigation against an alleged wrongdoer.

Here's why: Court justices opted to greatly expand the long-held IRS interpretation regarding proceeds, with that term now embracing any criminal penalties assessed and civil forfeitures applied, in addition to taxes paid.

The bottom line: The potential sources of money recovery for a whistleblower are now materially increased, which makes it reasonably likely that more individuals will come forward to implicate parties they say have acted unlawfully regarding their tax-related obligations.

Tax cases are commonly complex matters, with added layers of complexity certainly adhering in whistleblower actions.

No individual or corporate entity should ever be adjudged a wrongdoer absent a clear showing of facts that prove otherwise and that address every element of proof required under relevant laws.

Questions or concerns regarding any aspect of a civil or criminal tax investigation can be addressed to a proven tax law attorney.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information

Contact Us

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Email Us For A Response

Office Locations

Law Offices of Connie Yi, PC
323 Ray Street
Pleasanton, CA 94566

Phone: 925-484-0888
Pleasanton Law Office Map

19925 Stevens Creek Blvd
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014

Toll Free: 888-312-6978
Map & Directions

San Francisco
490 Post Street, Suite 508
San Francisco, CA 94102

Toll Free: 888-312-6978
Phone: 415-433-3350
Map & Directions